How much electrical capacity does a charging depot need?
Enough to deliver the fleet's nightly energy inside the charging window, which is far less than the sum of the charger nameplates. Twenty 9.6 kW ports are 192 kW of nameplate, but twenty vehicles taking 60 kWh each over a ten-hour window is 120 kW of actual demand — against 240 kW if you size the service the way an unmanaged installation has to be sized. Adding up nameplates and buying that service is the single most expensive mistake made on depot projects.
Updated 2026-08-20

Two different numbers, and only one of them is your service
Nameplate sum is a real number, and it is the number an unmanaged installation has to be designed against, because with no controller in the system there is nothing preventing that condition.It is not even the top of the range. EV supply equipment is a continuous load under NFPA 70 Article 625, so feeder and service sizing carries a 125 percent factor. Twenty ports at 9.6 kW is 192 kW of nameplate and 240 kW of service sizing.Managed peak does not depend on how many ports you install, because the ports are not the constraint — the energy and the clock are.
Why the code lets you size to the managed number
That is the provision the whole managed-depot approach rests on, and it is the reason a small controller can change the size of an electrical service.The language and the article reference depend on the edition your jurisdiction adopted. Older editions describe an automatic load management system within Article 625. The 2023 edition frames it as an energy management system under Article 750 and points 625.42 at it. Adoption is not uniform, not even within a state, so confirm which edition your authority having jurisdiction is enforcing before the design is drawn rather than at plan review.The practical requirement is the same across editions: the limit has to be enforced by the equipment, it has to be documented, and the setting has to appear on the drawings so an inspector can verify it. A promise from operations that they will stagger plug-ins is not a load management system and no inspector will accept it as one.Fix the setting in writing. If the controller caps the site at 120 kW, that number belongs on the one-line diagram, in the load letter to the utility, and in the commissioning record. It is the number the entire service size is justified by.
Turning kilowatts into a service you can order
At 208 volts three-phase, capacity gets expensive quickly in conductor terms. At 480 volts the same kilowatts need under half the current, which means smaller conductors, smaller conduit, less trench cross-section and cheaper switchgear — at the cost of a step-down transformer for the 208 or 240 volt charging equipment.There is no universal answer, but the crossover arrives earlier than people expect. Once the service exceeds a few hundred amps, the conductor and conduit saving from 480 volts starts paying for the transformer, and the difference compounds with distance across the yard.
The charging load is not the only thing on the service
A depot with a maintenance shop, compressors and a wash bay has a daytime profile that overnight charging misses entirely — which is good news you can only claim if you have the data.Get the data rather than estimating it. Utilities hold interval metering data for commercial accounts, usually twelve months of it, and will generally provide it on request. That gives you the existing peak, the shape of the day, and how much of the existing service is genuinely spare.That request is also a good first contact with the account representative you will need later, and it costs nothing. Ask for interval data and the current rate schedule in the same email.Then add headroom deliberately rather than by rounding: headroom for the vehicles in the next order, headroom for the exception charger, and headroom for the fact that the fleet's energy will grow before the service does.
What each error costs
Oversize and you pay twice: once in capital for switchgear, conductors and possibly a transformer the operation will never use, and again in calendar, because a larger service is more likely to require utility infrastructure work and the transformer lead time that comes with it.Undersize and adding capacity means going back to the utility, back into the queue, and often back into the yard with a trench.The asymmetry is why the sensible design oversizes the passive infrastructure and sizes the active equipment tightly. Conduit, duct bank, pad space and spare breaker positions are cheap while the trench is open and expensive afterwards. Transformers and switchgear are expensive both times, so buy those to the number the arithmetic supports.Say both numbers out loud in the utility application: the connected load and the managed maximum. A utility that only sees the connected load will size its side for the connected load, and you will be quoted for infrastructure your controller guarantees you will never use.
How many kW does a fleet charging depot need?
The fleet's nightly energy divided by the charging window, plus headroom and plus the site's existing load. Twenty vehicles taking 60 kWh each over ten hours is 120 kW of charging demand whether you install twenty ports or twelve. Port count sets the nameplate; energy and time set the service.
Can load management reduce the service size I have to buy?
Yes, and it is explicitly recognised in the electrical code: where an automatic system limits the total load, the service and feeder are sized to that limit rather than to the sum of the equipment ratings. The limit must be enforced by equipment, documented on the drawings and verifiable by an inspector.
Should the depot service be 208 V or 480 V?
480 V once the capacity is large, because the same kilowatts draw under half the current, shrinking conductors, conduit and switchgear across the whole yard. The cost is a step-down transformer for the charging equipment. On small depots 208 V is usually simpler and cheaper; on large ones the conductor saving pays for the transformer.
How do I find out how much spare capacity my site already has?
Ask your utility for twelve months of interval metering data on the account. That gives you the real existing peak rather than an estimate from the panel schedule, and it is free. Your existing peak plus your managed charging peak, with headroom, is the service you need.
Does an unmanaged depot really have to be sized to the full nameplate?
Yes. With nothing preventing every port drawing at once, that condition is the design condition, and continuous-load rules add a further 125 percent factor on top. That is the whole financial case for a load management controller: a small piece of equipment that changes the size of the service.
- NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, Articles 625 and 750 — continuous-load treatment of EV supply equipment, and sizing service and feeders to a load or energy management system limit. Article references and wording differ between adopted editions
- SolarTech, EV fleet charging complete guide — depot load management practice and the cost of building capacity once
- Recharged, How much does a commercial EV charging station cost — make-ready and electrical infrastructure as a share of project cost